Question 7 | Richard Flanagan (1)

After chatting with both Kim and Lisa about their reading progress through Richard Flanagan’s latest book, Question 7, I was prepared for two difficulties. Firstly, it would be almost impossible to take in everything Flanagan was posing in one reading and two, it would be extremely difficult to review the book. It only took me a handful of pages for their dilemma to become mine as well.

As a result, I have decided to tackle Question 7 one provocation at a time, over several posts. This may not be tidiest way to proceed, but it feels like the right way for me to gather my thoughts as I attempt a contemplative read of the text. Hopefully by the end I will be able to pull them all together into a cohesive response.

These Question 7 related posts will assume that you have read the book. If you have not and plan to, you may like to save them for later. So let me start at the very beginning.

The Epigraphs:

Hobart Town Mercury, reviewing Moby-Dick, 1951

This tickled my fancy straight away. As many of you know, I completed a #slowread of Moby-Dick a number of years ago. I finished up by saying “I realised that this was a book all about the journey. It’s about all the stuff we learn about ourselves and the world as we travel through it. It’s about working out our purpose in life. It’s about obsession.

I’m only about 25 pages into Richard Flanagan’s book, and I could say the same of Question 7 already.

The idea of a myriad of genres describes both Moby-Dick and Question 7 perfectly, although I suspect our Hobart Town Mercury reviewer didn’t necessarily mean it as a compliment. Moby-Dick is clearly more fiction than fact while Question 7 is clearly more interested in trying to get to the facts via fiction. In so many ways, Flanagan is also on a personal quest for his own white whale of truth and understanding, even when he tells us that ‘there is no truth. There is only why.’ (p4) he is still silently hoping (I believe) that the questions, the questing will give him some kind of answer or illumination by the end.

In The Conversation | Dan Dixon | 6 Nov 2023, Dixon states that this myriad approach “appears to derive from Flanagan’s anxiety that autobiography is necessarily fictitious. The desire to document one’s life accurately, he suggests, is made foolish by the ephemerality of language, the unreliability of memory, and the unaccountable contingencies of history.

In his Conversation with Richard Fidler in the Theatre Royal in Hobart, Flanagan also talks about how ineffectual the words of a book are, whereas ‘the drift’ is everything, and ‘the soul of the book’ is what you find yourself searching for instead. He also talks about Indigenous time and an essay he was sent by a Yolnju woman, Siena Stubbs, ‘about the use of a fourth tense in the Yolnju language.’ Acknowledgements – p277

This aside led me to Flanagan’s piece in the July 2023 issue of The Monthly where he quotes some of Stubbs’ essay “The past is in the present is in the future. Our ancestors were here, are here and will be here.” It is worth reading in full if you have the time. When I read Stubbs’ words, I realised that she spoke to the idea I was grasping to explain in my recent reread of A Christmas Carol when Scrooge talks about “I will live in the Past, the Present and the Future.

In this eloquent essay (which was Flanagan’s Closing Address for the 2023 Sydney Writers’ Festival) he also spoke powerfully about the Voice to Parliament and the idea of creating an Australian literature, an Australian voice and imagination that does not try to be a copy of the European or American idea of who and what we are.

Which leads me to the second epigraph.

Duke Ellington

As with some music, when you truly get lost in a beautiful arrangement, ‘life is always happening and has happened and will happen‘ p99 all at the same time, like a dream, where it all makes sense in the minds eye but is almost impossible to capture in words. It is these swirling, fleeting fragments of memory, story and experience that Flanagan attempts to corral, with a variety of tenses. into bite-sized paragraphs and little nuggets of chapters.

Time, place, memory, what we choose to forget, what we choose to remember, the stories we tell, our hopes and dreams, the people who populate our lives, those who journey with us long or just for a while, the love we have and to give. ‘What if we discovered we begin tomorrow and we died yesterday, that we were born out of the deaths of others and life is breathed into us from stories we invent out of songs, collages of jokes and riddles and other fragments?’ p11

I am reminded of the Ancient Greek image – the ouroboros – of the serpent forever swallowing its own tail, the infinite cycle of renewal and death that always has happened, is happening now and will always happen.

Opening Lines:

And so we begin…

This post was written on the traditional land of the Wangal clan, one of the 29 clans of the Eora Nation within the Sydney basin. This Reading Life recognises the continuous connection to Country, community and culture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. They are the traditional custodians of the lands, seas, and skies on which we live and they are this nations first storytellers.

14 thoughts on “Question 7 | Richard Flanagan (1)

  1. Oh dear, I won’t be reading these posts then for a long time, as I don’t want my reading to be affected by those of others, so I will just say good luck, and I look forward to reading it myself when the time comes. (Which, I’ve just checked, will be next month. Sounds like it will be a very interesting reading group conversation.)

    Like

    1. That’s okay Sue – I may still be writing these posts into next month! There’s a LOT to unpack.

      And possibly because I’m couch-bound thanks to Covid, I’ve been reading and listening to lots of interviews with Flanagan about this book. Right now, I am completely immersed in this book in a way I haven’t been since Moby-Dick.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I am going to love these posts, because (as you know by now) there was/is/will be so much to think about with this book and no review could do it justice, not without at least 10,000 words to play with!
    I am dying to see how Kim does it, because she is so brilliant at keeping her reviews to a sensible length, not like me…
    BTW I did not get the feeling that Flanagan was ‘anxious’ I think he is humbled by the complexity of what he is trying to do, and I think he is awash with a wise melancholy for all the deaths that swirl around in his story.

    Like

    1. Thanks Lisa – I did leave a comment on your post too, but I suspect it got sucked into the spam folder.

      I’ve listened to quite a few interviews with Flanagan now, and I agree, anxious was not quite the right word for Dixon to hit upon. He strikes me as being very particular and perhaps, exacting when it comes to writing and thinking (not like my shambolic approach to both!)

      The compassion and generosity with which he wrote this book also shines through in the talks.

      Like

  3. I, on the other hand don’t mind reading reviews ahead of reading the book, if I do, Flanagan’s previous works have often left me dissatisfied. For a while now I have been meaning to read First Person, which might give me some idea of how Flanagan uses fiction to interrogate the difference between truth and facts.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m with you there Bill. I have been very hit & miss with Flanagan in the past and I approached this somewhat cautiously. But I was hooked right from the word go.

      In thinking about how he uses the story of HG Wells and Rebecca West in this book, facts are proven things/known things like when and where they met for the first time, but the ‘truth’ is the words they speak to each other, or the words he gives to them. They tell each other their stories and that is their truth, but it may not be completely factual. Does that make sense?

      Like

Leave a comment