In The Misogyny Factor, Anne Summers traces the history of ‘the equality project’ over the last four decades and draws some grim conclusions. Full of brief, accessible recaps of the main ideas in feminism since the 1970s, The Misogyny Factor grew out of two speeches that Summers made in 2012.
This book had almost gone unnoticed on our shelves until the recent events in Australian politics. But then, all of a sudden, we’re getting double-barrelled requests for this book and The Stalking of Julia.
It’s funny the difference a week can make!
To say I felt anger whilst reading The Misogyny Factor is an understatement. But I also felt disappointment, frustration, despair and at times, I felt physically ill.
Anne Summers is a well-respected journalist, writer and feminist. I trust her work from experience. And that’s what makes this book so uncomfortable to read. Summers is telling us the truth and it’s hard to read.
Summers talks about the three indicators for success that would show us that women’s equality had been achieved. They are “inclusion, equality and respect.” While “the misogyny factor” is the obstacle.
Summers acknowledges the dictionary meaning of misogyny (hatred of women) but expands her definition to include the more complicated attitudes and behaviours that this implies and “that stand in the way of women being included, treated equally and accorded respect.”
The first half of The Misogyny Factor is full of facts and figures. There are the ‘firsts’ and all the successful legislation passed to ensure that women, on paper, in law, have equal rights. But then she counters with all the backsliding, the downgrading and the reduced policies that have happened since.
And even though I knew this to be true already, seeing it in print still sent shivers down my spine, “not only will a woman earn less than a man with identical or similar educational levels; not only will she earn less than a man with children, but she will also earn less than a man with considerably less educational attainments than she has.”
I’m always cautious when people start quoting facts and figures. Facts and figures can be manipulated and interpreted to mean anything you want, so I was glad that Summers book wasn’t just chapter after chapter of statistics and percentages.
The second half of the book focuses on Julia Gillard and her time as Prime Minister. Summers has documented page after page, incident after incident, media report after media report, twitter bile after twitter bile judging, criticising and accusing Gillard purely on the basis of her gender. You should be able to disagree with someone’s politics or policies without referring to gender, religion or race. But in this case, it seemed impossible for many, many people in Australia.
It would be easy to come away from this book feeling nothing but despair, but Summers finishes with some action guidelines. The main one is “it stops with me”.
“Next time you get one of those emails, don’t delete it – send it back to whomever sent it to you and tell them: it stops with me. When someone in your company refers to the Prime Minister disrespectfully, don’t ignore it – tell them off: it stops with me.
5 thoughts on “The Misogyny Factor | Anne Summers #AWWnon-fiction”
Great post! Here in the US, in NJ, the governor got very upset when the press asked questions about his recent lap-band surgery. He said it was \”stupid\” to spend time discussing his weight.I told a friend, if he was a woman, he'd have had to deal with having it discussed (and criticized) a lot more often, that's for sure!
And don't forget the questions about hair, clothes and whether or not he had children!
This is on my TBR – I've wanted to read more of her work since her tremendous essay on the sexualized abuse of JG which I read on her webpage (I assume this has been worked into the book now). It can be difficult for women to speak up about say 'it stops with me', because of the various power relations at play, but it is certainly good advice.
Exactly–and if not, why not?